Thursday, February 12, 2009
Six Word Stories
“For sale: baby shoes, never worn.”
Obviously not a Hemingway, here are a few of my six-word stories.
For business.
• Bad economy. Chest pain. Perhaps curable.
Or lighter ones:
• Beautiful pitch, perfect swing, one hero.
• Across the room, her smile spoke.
Or a sad one.
• Valentine’s Day. Where is she now?
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
Paradigm Shifts Coming
In an earlier post, December 28, 2008, I wrote about shifting paradigms. Now the signs are growing stronger – the recession we now experience will permanently change our lives. Paradigms will shift right before our eyes.
Petroleum prices will again rise. As the economies of the industrialized nations regain strength the demand for energy will rise and with it the price of all forms of energy. The days of electric powered vehicles are coming fast.
Renewable energy is gaining. Chipping away at the market, it will add momentum as a result of the government’s stimulus spending.
Renewable energy comes many sources: biomass as fuel for burning and converting into e e thanol; geothermal sources not only hot water but water at 50° to 60° not far below ground level; the sun through solar thermal uses and photovoltaic electricity; the wind; the tides and ocean currents; untapped flowing rivers providing hydroelectric energy; and possibly others. By 2020 the share of all electricity generated from renewable sources will be slightly over 10%. (http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/forecasting.html)
In time there will be more electricity generated from nuclear energy. Not in a short time though. By 2020 nuclear power generation will rise from about 2% now to almost 10%. (http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/forecasting.html
We will see more and more energy neutral housing. Voluntarily initially, and later forced by building codes. Per capita energy consumption for housing will decline appreciably, over the next twenty and more years. Technologies already in use in
Banks will become banks to accept deposits and lend money, and not to be places to make investments. Investment banks will just what the words say – places to make investments. Both will be more rigorously regulated (until the next lull.)
Athletes earn as much as owners are willing to pay them. If they have a bad year, though, their compensation normally goes down. Why not apply the same rules to the executives of our corporations? If you are a stockholder of a company, will you push for realistic executive compensation, and accountability for performance? If so, inflated salaries will slowly disappear, especially after stockholders sue enough Boards of Directors for failing in their fiduciary role. Instead of bonuses, poor performance will lead to reduced compensation. Is this an unreal dream? I do not think so.
(Charlie’s note: I wrote this blog posting early Tuesday morning. As usual, it was in the editing process until this morning, Wednesday. I was surprised to read, a day after I wrote the above, that President Obama has suggested limiting salaries for executives of companies accepting bailout money.)
The paradigm for health care in the
The psychological effects of the recession will last for many years. Financial caution will be the watchword. Just as is the financial caution of elders who suffered through the Great Depression. This is not limited to only those who incomes have suffered in the recession – almost all. There will be a slow market for luxury items, from yachts to houses and down the line. This caution is not limited to consumers. Businesses of all sizes will spend less freely and expand more slowly.
Air travel, in the midst of rapid change, will be even more difficult than it is now. There will be no relaxation of security; it will become even tighter. Fares will remain high. There will be fewer flights and almost all will be full.
Because of high fuel costs, people will travel less, and when they do, for shorter distances. As a result, families will tend not to scatter as far as they do today; conversely, family units will become more compact. Additionally, the young will assume more responsibility for their elders. I believe there will be a strengthening of family values.
Thursday, January 15, 2009
"The only thing we have to fear...."
“So first of all let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear. . .is fear itself. . . nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance.”
Taken from President Franklin Roosevelt’s first inaugural speech, in 1933, these words might well be spoken by Barack Obama next Tuesday, January 20th, Inauguration Day, 2009.
President Obama will then face the worst economic conditions since those faced by President Roosevelt.
He must bring to his presidency a clear vision of what he wants done with bailout and stimulus, and then have the leadership strength to accomplish it.
For the benefit of our country, and politics aside, best of luck to him.
Friday, January 9, 2009
No Time to Waste
President-elect Obama has asked Congress for quick passage of an economic stimulus package. Some in Congress are grumbling, and some seem to want to analyze and modify the basic requests in time-consuming processes. Obama wants Congress to move faster than that, and with good reason.
Much of the proposed stimulus money aims at projects already on the books, for the most part designed and ready to go. Implementing those projects will very quickly add jobs to the economy.
With unemployment claims over 500,000 a month, and two month delay in approving the stimulus proposals will add a million people to the unemployed list. The unemployment rate, just reported at 7.2% will climb another point. Even with the stimulus funds moving toward projects, unemployment will continue to rise at least two months. That could be another million workers out of work, and the unemployment rate over 9%.
So, Congress, hear the message.
There is no time to waste.
Forget about partisan politics. Forget about your egos. Our economy is crumbling. The longer it takes to get the stimulus package approved, the more it will crumble.
Get with the program.
Sunday, December 28, 2008
Shifting Paradigms
Paradigms are a set of assumptions, concepts, values, and practices that constitutes a way of viewing reality for the community that shares them. (From a definition found at www.thefreedictionary.com/paradigm.)
When a paradigm in an industry changes, the business “winners” after the change most often are not the old-line companies who were the winners before the change. They are fresh new entities with new ideas for satisfying the market. The winners have no entrenched personal empires, no buildings and factories to amortize, no rigid ways of doing business – all of which prevent the old companies from changing.
What the new companies do have is a large dose of outside-the-box thinking, a willingness to take risks, the energy to get things done quickly, few layers of management….
Old, classic examples of paradigm changes include the railroaders who hauled passengers but thought of themselves as railroaders, and who were overwhelmed by the airlines who entered the business of hauling passengers in airplanes instead of trains. How would our landscape look now if the railroads, instead of scoffing at the airlines, had become the movers of passengers by airplane as well as trains?
Consider the Swiss, whose paradigm of a watch included a spring, escapement, gears, hands and a dial face. Enter the Japanese, whose paradigm for a watch includes a battery, a chip and a digital readout. The watch making business all but disappeared from
Almost every day paradigm shifts are taking place.
Consider the impact of NetFlix, with a new paradigm for distributing movies for the home market, had on the video store of the old paradigm. How many video stores remain, and how big a share does NetFlix have of the market? In watching the postal worker put mail in the boxes near my home, and seeing NetFlix envelopes in almost half the boxes, the question is answered.
Another recent shift is the advent of Craig’s List, the Internet classified advertising giant. From a small beginning in
Now we see several paradigm shifts in the auto industry. Fuel prices will soon rise again, creating greater and greater demand for fuel efficient vehicles. Electric cars, and hybrid-electric cars will eventually dominate. Lithium ion batteries will replace older technology. Are the old-line battery companies leading the charge to lithium ion? It does not seem so – the bulk of the companies manufacturing them are in the
There will be many paradigm shifts resulting from the deep economic recession. The next posts to this blog will explore ideas about them.
Sign of the Times
As sometimes I do, today I looked in the Daily Camera, the
That is a 40% reduction of job availability in slightly over two months. Probably the end of season has some effect on the numbers, but not 40%.
The shortage of jobs is a grim reminder of the depth of the recession. It portends a long and slow recovery of consumer spending, the primary driver of our economy, and thus a long and slow recovery in the economy.
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
Bailout or Failure?
It is Wednesday evening and so far, there is no bailout program for the auto industry. Although a bailout is not the greatest idea, compared to certain other options, it is by far the lesser of two evils when considering the consequences of the failure of at least two of the three American auto makers.
Without an immediate bailout, GM and Chrysler will no doubt file for bankruptcy in the next sixty days. Executives of the companies have said bankruptcy would be q disaster because customers would not buy their cars. That does not make complete sense, though. If the manufacturers maintained their warranty programs throughout bankruptcy, and dealer service departments continued to operate, it seems people would buy the vehicles. The bigger problem of revenue generation is the lack of the right vehicles for the market, not a bankruptcy.
As earlier written on this blog, it still seems that bankruptcy of GM, with post petition financing guaranteed by the government; a line of credit for Ford guaranteed by the government; and the breakup of Chrysler makes the most sense.
If in bankruptcy, GM can quickly deal with the problems of high labor costs, high legacy costs, too many dealers and debt overload. They can shed models and factories and dealers, and renegotiate their debt, and in two years exit bankruptcy as a smoothly operating company with the beginning of a competitive model lineup. Many thousand dealers will be out of business, with great dislocation to customers and employees – unfortunately that is the consequence of the Big 3’s poor management through the years.
Although Ford is stronger than GM, they also may need to go through a Chapter 11 proceeding in order to achieve all their goals in the time available. Union reaction will have great importance in determining the issue.
The next few days will decide the fate of the companies, their employees, their customers and the many other stakeholders. Too bad I will not be the “Car Czar.”